Style and Substance
By Archived Story
Posted in Sound & Vision | No Comments
It’s hard to tell whether the harshest critics of Wes Anderson (director of such films as Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou and The Royal Tenenbaums) lack imagination, or whether they flat-out don’t get it. Either way, his work can be easily characterized as “not for everyone.”These critics need to offer legitimate rationale for this negative point of view. Instead, they use buzzwords like “pretentious” and “affected,” and calling Anderson a one-trick pony who relies on the same formula of privileged characters desensitized by disjointed familial issues.Though I would agree that there is a definite tone and common subject matter present in Anderson’s work, to call it a formula is to undermine the entire notion of an auteur. It would be like saying Akira Kurosawa was formulaic because he made samurai movies.The word pretentious is …



