Expand

The Constant Gardener Stands Out Among Holly

February 8th, 2006
By Archived Story

I love movies. That’s why I truly enjoy writing about them. Yes, there are many bad movies out there, but part of what I love is that every once in a while, a film so utterly astounding comes along that it lets me forget the rest of the crap released by Hollywood and reinvigorates my love of movies as both entertainment and art. Right now that film is The Constant Gardner.

The story centers on Justin Quayle (Ralph Fiennes) and his relationship with a woman named Tessa (Rachel Weisz). It also involves countless deaths in Africa, pharmaceutical companies and government cover-ups. It’s a romantic drama, a thriller and a social commentary all in one. And they all work here. Each theme leads into the other, not from writing necessity but from reason.

Really it reminded me most of Casablanca. Both films concentrate on a very personal and somewhat tragic love story set amidst an involving political backdrop. While The Constant Gardner came out amid the explosions and chest shaving jokes of summer, it isn’t your typical summer blockbuster fare. The film relies on emotion and visuals to keep its story propelling forward. I would go so far as to call it a mainstream high art film, one of the most pleasing oxymorons I can think of.

I usually shy away from talking about technical parts of movies but The Constant Gardner has some of the best cinematography I’ve seen recently. The use of different camera styles for different locations has been done before (most notably in Traffic) but never have I seen it implemented so fluidly. Beyond that, there are simply countless shots that would be right at home in a photography magazine. And the music … incredible! Sorry, I’m getting carried away. Have I given the film enough of a proverbial hand job yet?

One thing to note is that the style of The Constant Gardner is a bit disorienting at first. Eventually, however, it gives the film a sort of lyrical flow. There are many flashbacks and time disruptions but they all serve the purpose of eliciting certain feelings. They become more of a storytelling tool than a crutch (cough … Quentin Tarantino). This also means a second viewing is fairly necessary—which is why I’m recommending it on DVD.

When writing reviews, I try to find the good parts even in truly terrible movies. I also try to point out the shortcomings of great films. I like to be fair. But I don’t know what bad parts there are to point out here. If there’s something not to like about The Constant Gardner, I don’t see it. I apologize for not being subtle right now. I just need to get this off my chest: The Constant Gardner is one of the best films I’ve seen in a long time.



Leave a Comment





Related Stories

None just yet

Advertisements